- Iridient developer fuji film simulation software#
- Iridient developer fuji film simulation iso#
- Iridient developer fuji film simulation series#
- Iridient developer fuji film simulation windows#
They invented a new filter, the X-Trans, which in a nutshell passes all color data in a different array but its all true color, not created by the camera or other software.
Fuji is all about color and that method just didn’t jive with them since color matters so much. This is a filter that passes all the red color data, but the remaining blue and green colors only have half their data passed and the rest is interpolated to make it 100%. Typically, 99.5% of the cameras out there use a Bayer filter over the sensor. Sharp values in Lightroom: ‘Amount: 85’, ‘Radius: 1’, ‘Detail: 100’, ‘Masking: 25’ Meet our new project GRAIN Magazine and subscribe for a LIFETIME membership.Being a Fujifilm X systems camera user, which are those Fujifilm cameras with the X-Trans sensor, Raw conversion has always been a concern. However, a few days ago a new tool that caught my attention: the Iridient X-Transformer.
Iridient developer fuji film simulation windows#
IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER COMPRESSED RAW WINDOWSįor now in Beta stage and Windows version only (Mac users will have to wait a few more days – it will be released this month). In a very simple way, what Iridient X-Transformer does is, using the technology from the Iridient Developer, converts the RAF files to DNG. And almost the entire Internet knows that Iridient makes the demosaic of Fuji files like no other. Okay, but is it worth spending about $ 30 on this tool? Yes, and maybe not. Only you can reach that conclusion, not me. You can start by downloading the beta version of Iridient X-Transformer 1.0 from here. Obviously, this is a demo version that places watermarks on the converted files. When using this tool, I have to use another operating system to convert the RAF.
Iridient developer fuji film simulation software#
When the Mac version comes out, the workflow will be a bit smaller.Īs software in Beta stage, this Iridient is not immune to errors, small bugs. IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER COMPRESSED RAW SOFTWARE But, in a general way, it behaved very well. Except that, to convert a considerable number of files, brutally slowed the speed of my PC. And we’re talking about a reasonably well equipped machine. Here’s the first note: Do the conversions when you least need the computer, or you won’t be able to do almost anything if you want to work while you’re converting.
Iridient developer fuji film simulation series#
That said, let’s go to what matters and what everyone will be waiting for: what results do we get from using this Iridient X Transformer? Let’s see next.Īfter we start this tool we have a series of options that we can adjust to taste. IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER COMPRESSED RAW SERIES But nothing better than to start working with the definitions that the author of Iridient thinks are the most balanced. That is, in the ‘RAW Options’ tab, almost everything in ‘Default’.Īfter finishing the conversion of the chosen files, I imported the DNGs and RAFs into Lightroom. An interesting alternative is to integrate, as if it was a plugin, the Iridient in Lightroom – in this article you will find all the necessary steps. Increasing to 1:1 in Lightroom the differences are notorious and abysmal. Iridient DNGs come much more detailed than RAF imported directly into Lightroom.
Iridient developer fuji film simulation iso#
However, I note that, in the night image, with ISO 3200, unaesthetic artefacts (worms) appear. And this happens with any photo that has a slightly higher ISO.
In this case Lightroom presents the cleanest images, only noticing the grain (actually nice in the case of the Fujifilm cameras) of an image with higher ISO. The next step I gave on the Iridient was to move the ‘Sharpening’ item to ‘None’. And, again, import and compare the images with RAF imported directly, and without any editing, into Lightroom.
DNG Left, RAF Right DNG Left, RAF Right DNG Left, RAF Right DNG Left, RAF Right This way, the difference in the detail from Iridient DNG files in relation to RAFs is already smaller, but still (slightly) noticeable. I re-imported the DNGs with sharp in ‘Default’ in the Iridient and I have now introduced the JPGs created in camera (I usually shoot RAW + JPG), having adjusted in Lightroom the DNG and RAF ‘Profile’ for the type of film simulation I used In the JPG. Even here the work of the Iridient is spectacular, showing detail once again superior to either the JPG or RAF. I did not like, once again, the work on converting the night image with ISO 3200, where worms are very noticeable.
0 kommentar(er)
